I changed things around a bit, and added a few things. It's as new to me as it is to you, but I think it'll work. As usual I'll try to have a variety of topics, but come summer there will be more postings about car events. You can email me at cruisaholic@hotmail.com Keep the shiny side up!

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Senate testimony

Testimony of
Michael Tanner
Director of Health and Welfare Studies
The Cato Institute
Before the:
Senate Judiciary Committee
Subcommittee on Youth Violence

June 7, 1995

The following is taken from the text of this testimony-

Welfare contributes to crime in several ways. First, children from single-parent families are more likely to become involved in criminal activity. According to one study, children raised in single-parent families are one-third more likely to exhibit anti-social behavior.(3) Moreover, O'Neill found that, holding other variables constant, black children from single- parent households are twice as likely to commit crimes as black children from a family where the father is present. Nearly 70 percent of juveniles in state reform institutions come from fatherless homes, as do 43 percent of prison inmates.(4) Research indicates a direct correlation between crime rates and the number of single-parent families in a neighborhood.(5)



The relationship [between single-parent families and crime] is so strong that controlling for family configuration erases the relationship between race and crime and between low income and crime. This conclusion shows up time and again in the literature. The nation's mayors, as well as police officers, social workers, probation officers, and court officials, consistently point to family break up as the most important source of rising rates of crime.(6)

At the same time, the evidence of a link between the availability of welfare and out-of-wedlock births is overwhelming. There have been 13 major studies of the relationship between the availability of welfare benefits and out-of-wedlock birth. Of these, 11 found a statistically significant correlation. Among the best of these studies is the work done by June O'Neill for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Holding constant a wide range of variables, including income, education, and urban vs. suburban setting, the study found that a 50 percent increase in the value of AFDC and foodstamp payments led to a 43 percent increase in the number of out-of-wedlock births.(7) Likewise, research by Shelley Lundberg and Robert Plotnick of the University of Washington showed that an increase in welfare benefits of $200 per month per family increased the rate of out-of-wedlock births among teenagers by 150 percent.(8)

Current welfare policies seem to be designed with an appallingly lack of concern for their impact on out-of-wedlock births. Indeed, Medicaid programs in 11 states actually provide infertility treatments to single women on welfare.(12)

As welfare contributes to the rise in out-of-wedlock births and single-parent families, it concomitantly contributes to the associated increase in criminal activity.

So if you want to read more of this testimony please go here. This is why I don't think of myself as anti-poor, I just don't like a program that is so obviously broken.

6 comments:

Socialist Christian Hippie said...

so...give us an answer. Sterility programs? Starve a child if the mother has another one? Open orphanages? Give me options. What does the (bleach!) Cato institute suggest? Kill them all, let God sort it out, probably.

cruiser said...

They are suggesting widespread reform. And yes I have some answers. If she doesn't want to marry the guy who got her pregnant, he can pay child support. It has been proven time and time again that the system we now have doesn't work. I personally don't care if a poor woman has 12 kids, just don't expect my tax dollars to pay for the kid for the next 18 years. The only thing the current system does is teach single mothers how to milk the system out of everything they can get. There's no guarantee that the money goes for the kids. It would be far cheaper for us to make the women finish school, the boyfriends pay child support, both of them be employed, and for these bums to be responsible for themselves. With some families on welfare for 3 or 4 generations now, it hasn't worked as is. Somewhere it says- God helps those who help themselves. Time for some tough love.

Socialist Christian Hippie said...

Nowhere in any bible does it say "God helps those who help themselves". This is a myth.

I see you've started a further post about this, so I'll end my particular comments to this thread with the above.

Peace

cruiser said...

Well then I am wrong. When I say I am correctable I mean it. Sorry if anyone was offended.

Anonymous said...

Cruiser: The current laws in both Iowa and Illinois require the single mothers on welfare to give a name of the father for child support pursposes. If she doesn't then she can't collect the aid.

I get frustrated with the babydady crap too, but it is cultural. Change the culture.

cruiser said...

And how much support do you think the state collects? If they really went after these guys and made them pay, they wouldn't have a job. Who's to say she gives them the real name anyway, some unemployed jerk could just say he's the father and can't pay and that would be the end of it. I'm say it's going to take big changes in the current system, and that'll never happen because people don't get worked up enough to stop it, politicians won't do anything because it's good during elections to help the "poor". But when it runs in a family for generations it's wrong.